Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1561463
 
 

Footnotes (99)



 


 



A Plurality of Discontent: Legal Pluralism, Religious Adjudication and the State


Adam S. Hofri-Winogradow


Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law

March 1, 2010

Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 101-133, 2010

Abstract:     
Can a modern state provide its citizens with a just and stable legal order while adopting religious normativities as part of its law? While dispute resolution according to some type of religious law is available in nearly every jurisdiction, it is Muslim-majority jurisdictions, as well as the only Jewish-majority jurisdiction, Israel, that explicitly adopt religious normativities as parts of their positive law. After discussing the different ways in which state legal systems may be made to apply religious normativities, the article concludes that such an integrationist approach leads not only to injustice, but also to continuous instability. To illustrate this conclusion by way of example, I describe the recent expansion of non-state religious adjudication in Israel. While Israel has long based much of its family law on several religious legal traditions, giving traditional religious courts jurisdiction over the subject, Israeli religious conservatives are now rapidly establishing non-state courts which apply Jewish religious law to subject areas other than family law, intending to draw litigants away from the state civil court system. Other, Muslim-majority jurisdictions attempting to integrate religious adjudication into their state legal systems are also prone to continuous instability. Much of the injustice stems from the common choice of family law as the subject to which the state applies religious normativities; the religious law of the family infringes core human rights standards far more than many other parts of religious law. Since religious conservatives ascribe a special importance to religious family law and are unlikely to be satisfied with the choice of another subject as the point where state law is to be impacted by religious law, Muslim-majority jurisdictions' and Israel's struggle with conservatives' demands that religious normativities be applied as state law, and with the injustice and instability consequent on granting those demands, is likely to continue.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: Israel, religious law, halacha, shari'a, sharia, legal pluralism, zionism, religious zionism, occupied territories, islam, middle east, family law, ADR, alternative dispute resolution, religious adjudication, arbitration

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K40, K41, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 5, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Hofri-Winogradow, Adam S., A Plurality of Discontent: Legal Pluralism, Religious Adjudication and the State (March 1, 2010). Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 101-133, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1561463

Contact Information

Adam S. Hofri-Winogradow (Contact Author)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law ( email )
Mount Scopus, 91905
Israel
HOME PAGE: http://law.huji.ac.il/eng/segel.asp?staff_id=79&cat=441

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 907
Downloads: 215
Download Rank: 82,000
Footnotes:  99

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds