Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1561926
 
 

Citations (5)



 
 

Footnotes (79)



 


 



The Dilemma of Direct Democracy


Craig M. Burnett


University of North Carolina at Wilmington

Elizabeth Garrett


USC Gould School of Law

Mathew D. McCubbins


Duke University

September 8, 2010

USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 10-3
Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, Vol. 9, No. 4

Abstract:     
The dilemma of direct democracy is that voters may not always be able to make welfare-improving decisions. Lupia’s seminal work has led us to believe that voters can substitute voting cues for substantive policy knowledge. Lupia, however, emphasized that cues were valuable under certain conditions and not others. In what follows, we present three main findings regarding voters and what they know about California’s Proposition 7. First, much like Lupia reported, we show voters who are able to recall endorsements for or against a ballot measure vote similarly to people who recall certain basic facts about the initiative. We show, second, that voters whose stated policy preferences would otherwise suggest they would favor the “no” position cast their ballots with far less error than do people who favor the “yes” position. One thing this suggests is that many voters may employ a “defensive no” strategy when faced with complex policy choices on the ballot. Our third result is a bit surprising: we find that better-informed voters, whether this information is derived from factual knowledge of the initiative or from knowledge of well-publicized voting cues, are no more likely to make reasoned decisions than those who are, by our measure, uninformed. This suggests that existing theories of voter choice, especially in direct democracy, may be inadequate. We conclude with some preliminary policy recommendations that could help improve the information environment for initiatives and referenda by providing key information on the ballot.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: direct democracy, voter competence, initiatives, referenda

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 3, 2010 ; Last revised: October 14, 2010

Suggested Citation

Burnett, Craig M. and Garrett, Elizabeth and McCubbins, Mathew D., The Dilemma of Direct Democracy (September 8, 2010). USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 10-3. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1561926 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1561926

Contact Information

Craig M. Burnett (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina at Wilmington ( email )
601 South College Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
United States
910-962-2161 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://people.uncw.edu/burnettc/
Elizabeth Garrett
USC Gould School of Law ( email )
699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States
213-740-0064 (Phone)
213-740-5502 (Fax)

Mathew D. McCubbins
Duke University ( email )
Department of Political Science
208 Gross Hall, 140 Science Drive
Durham, NC 27708
United States
(213) 973-7538 (Phone)
(213) 973-3623 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://mccubbins.us
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 944
Downloads: 249
Download Rank: 67,144
Citations:  5
Footnotes:  79

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.812 seconds