Abstract

 
 

References (52)



 


 



The Pro-Competitive Effect of Campaign Limits in Non-Majoritarian Elections


Matias Iaryczower


Princeton University

Andrea Mattozzi


European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO)

March 1, 2010

California Institute of Technology Social Science Working Paper No. 1319

Abstract:     
We study a model of elections in non-majoritarian systems that captures the link between competition in policies and competition in campaign spending. We argue that the overall competitiveness of the political arena depends both on the endogenous number of parties contesting the election and the endogenous level of campaign spending. These two dimensions are linked together through their combined effect on the total equilibrium level of political rents. We illustrate the key insights of the model through the analysis of two major electoral institutions: campaign spending limits and compulsory voting. In particular, we show that under some conditions spending caps and compulsory voting can be pro-competitive, leading to an increase in the number of parties contesting the elections.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Elections, Proportional Representation, Campaign Finance, Valence, Abstention

JEL Classification: D72, D78, C72

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 3, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Iaryczower, Matias and Mattozzi, Andrea, The Pro-Competitive Effect of Campaign Limits in Non-Majoritarian Elections (March 1, 2010). California Institute of Technology Social Science Working Paper No. 1319. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1562098 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562098

Contact Information

Matias Iaryczower
Princeton University ( email )
Corwin Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544-1012
United States
Andrea Mattozzi (Contact Author)
European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) ( email )
Villa San Paolo
Via della Piazzuola 43
50133 Florence
Italy
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 141
Downloads: 18
References:  52

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds