The FTC's Misguided Rationale for the Use of Section 5 in Sherman Act Cases
Geoffrey A. Manne
Lewis & Clark Law School; International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE)
February 28, 2010
The CPI Antitrust Journal, Vol. 2, February 2010
This essay criticizes the Federal Trade Commission's defense of its use Section 5 of the FTC Act in the Intel case. The FTC's (and particularly Chairman Leibowitz') claims that the error cost concerns that figure prominently in recent Supreme Court Sherman Act cases ought not to apply, and are not intended to apply, to government enforcers are misguided and dangerous.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: Federal Trade Commission, antitrust, Sherman Act, FTC Act, Section 5, Intel, Error costs
JEL Classification: K21, K23, K41, L42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 2, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.391 seconds