Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1562690
 
 

Footnotes (465)



 


 



Lawyers, Guns and Money: Why the Tiahrt Amendment’s Ban on the Admissibility of ATF Trace Data in State Court Actions Violates the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment


Colin Miller


University of South Carolina School of Law

March 2, 2010

Utah Law Review, Vol. 2010, No. 665, 2010

Abstract:     
The Tiahrt Amendment provides in relevant part that ATF trace data "shall be inadmissible in evidence, and shall not be used, relied on, or disclosed in any manner, nor shall testimony or other evidence be permitted based on the data, in a civil action in any State (including the District of Columbia) or Federal court..." This Amendment has hamstrung cities and localities which, in an effort to combat crime with civil litigation, have brought actions against the gun industry sounding in public nuisance, with trace data being crucial to the success of such actions. Because this Amendment regulates state as well as federal court proceedings, it is defensible, if at all, under Congress’ Commerce Clause power.

President Obama backed away from a campaign promise to repeal the Amendment, but the Amendment appears vulnerable to constitutional attack. In United States v. Lopez, the Supreme Court found that the Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) of 1990 exceeded Congress' Commerce Clause power because it was directed at criminal conduct, not commerce, and in Printz v. United States, it found that interim provisions in the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act violated the Tenth Amendment because they purported to direct state executive officers to participate in the administration of a federally enacted regulatory scheme. This article argues that the state court evidentiary provisions on the Tiahrt Amendment are not meaningfully different from the GFSZA and the interim Brady provisions, rendering them similarly indefensible under the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 79

Keywords: Evidence, Commerce Clause, Tenth Amendment, Firearms, ATF, Tiahrt Amendment

JEL Classification: K14, K40, K41, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 3, 2010 ; Last revised: September 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Miller, Colin, Lawyers, Guns and Money: Why the Tiahrt Amendment’s Ban on the Admissibility of ATF Trace Data in State Court Actions Violates the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment (March 2, 2010). Utah Law Review, Vol. 2010, No. 665, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1562690 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562690

Contact Information

Colin Miller (Contact Author)
University of South Carolina School of Law ( email )
Main & Greene Streets
Columbia, SC 29208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,092
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 151,431
Footnotes:  465

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.234 seconds