Courts and the Politics of Backlash: Marriage Equality Litigation, Then and Now
Jane S. Schacter
Stanford Law School
September 1, 2009
Southern California Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 6, 2009
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1564301
Groundbreaking decisions on same-sex marriage, particularly those from the Hawaii, Massachusetts, and California supreme courts, have generated widespread political backlash in the form of state constitutional amendments and statutes, the federal Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), a proposed federal constitutional amendment, and more. By contrast, the first state supreme court decision to strike down a ban on interracial marriage - Perez v. Sharp, decided by the California Supreme Court in 1948 - was met with barely a political whimper, even though it made international headlines and came decades before broad public acceptance of interracial marriage. This Article identifies that puzzling difference, tells the political story of the cases, explores factors that might explain the disparity in political and public reactions, and uses the contrasting case studies to elucidate the political dynamics that surround courts today and to suggest directions for the future study of antijudicial backlash.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 73Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 5, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds