Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564465
 
 

Footnotes (221)



 


 



The Facts About Ring v. Arizona and the Jury's Role in Capital Sentencing


Sam Kamin


University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Justin F. Marceau


University of Denver Sturm College of Law

March 3, 2010

U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-11

Abstract:     
When it was decided in 2002, Ring v. Arizona appeared to be a watershed in the way capital sentences are handed out in the United States: it overturned several states’ death penalty statutes and appeared to imperil many more. Ring announced that the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey applied to capital sentencing and required that any fact necessary to the imposition of the death penalty be proven to a jury and beyond a reasonable doubt. Yet eight years after the case was decided, it is not clear what, if anything, Ring in fact demands of the states. Determining exactly what constitutes fact-finding, and therefore which tasks must be carried out by the capital jury rather than a judge, remains a challenging task.

In this article we investigate the impact of Ring by analyzing several typical capital statutes against both the language of the Ring opinion and the broader framework of the Court’s Sixth and Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. What we find is that in all but the most obvious cases, Ring’s mandate is an extraordinarily weak one. What is more, Ring creates perverse incentives for the states; juries can be removed from the capital sentencing equation entirely simply by making capital decisionmaking open-ended and amorphous rather than fact-based and legalistic. We argue that this pressure toward open-ended decisionmaking creates significant Eighth Amendment concerns.

We conclude that this tension between the Sixth and Eighth Amendments demonstrates the limits of Ring’s narrow focus on fact-finding and argues for the grounding of a more robust capital jury right in the Eighth Amendment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 5, 2010 ; Last revised: April 4, 2012

Suggested Citation

Kamin, Sam and Marceau, Justin F., The Facts About Ring v. Arizona and the Jury's Role in Capital Sentencing (March 3, 2010). U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564465 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1564465

Contact Information

Sam Kamin (Contact Author)
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
303-871-6125 (Phone)
303-871-6711 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.du.edu/index.php/profile/sam-kamin
Justin F. Marceau
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,149
Downloads: 113
Download Rank: 142,306
Footnotes:  221

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.594 seconds