Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564934
 


 



Constitutional Partnership and the States


Aaron J. Saiger


Fordham University School of Law

2005

Fordham Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 1439, 2005

Abstract:     
This essay is part of a book symposium that focuses upon two recent volumes: Lawrence Sager’s Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of American Constitutional Practice (2004) and Larry D. Kramer’s The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (2004). Both volumes propose “theories of taking the [federal] Constitution seriously outside the courts.” This Essay reconsiders Sager’s and Kramer’s conclusions in light of judicial and extrajudicial interpretation of state constitutions. Sager’s argument that the United States Congress should enforce federal constitutional rights underenforced by federal courts applies with even more force to state legislators, executives and judges than to federal legislators. Sager’s account also suggests that state court judges have a duty to interpret their own state constitutions in a justice-seeking fashion. The Essay’s conclusion suggests that contemporary versions of Kramer’s popular constitutionalism are currently being played out over state constitutional provisions regarding family law and school finance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 6, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Saiger, Aaron J., Constitutional Partnership and the States (2005). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 1439, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564934

Contact Information

Aaron J. Saiger (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 172
Downloads: 10

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds