Boundary Regulation in Social Media
Frederic D. Stutzman
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Information and Library Science (SILS)
Samford University - Cumberland School of Law; Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society
October 8, 2009
In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY, USA, 2012 (pp. 769--778). ACM
The management of group context in socially mediating technologies is an important challenge for the design community. To better understand how users manage group context, we explored the practice of multiple profile management in social media. In doing so, we observed creative and opportunistic strategies for group context management. We found that multiple profile maintenance is motivated by four factors: privacy, identity, utility, and propriety. Drawing on these motives, we observe a continuum of boundary regulation behaviors: pseudonymity, practical obscurity, and transparent separation. Based on these findings, we encourage designers of group context management systems to more broadly consider motives and practices of group separations in social media. Group context management systems should be privacy-enhancing, but a singular focus on privacy overlooks a range of other group context management practices.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: privacy, online communities, social mediaAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 10, 2010 ; Last revised: February 28, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.407 seconds