Lawyers Who Break the Law: What Congress Can Do to Prevent Mental Health Patient Advocates from Violating Federal Legislation
Amanda J. Peters
South Texas College of Law
March 8, 2010
Oregon Law Review, Vol. 89, No. 133, 2010
In 1986, Congress enacted the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (PAIMI). PAIMI created a national, federally-funded system of patient advocacy for individuals with mental illness. Patient advocates are lawyers who are charged with protecting individuals who have mental illness from abuse, neglect, and civil rights violations.
Over the past twenty-four years, advocates have saved countless individuals from abuse and death. However, numerous federal Department of Justice investigations reveal that patient advocates are not always carrying out their PAIMI responsibilities. Instead, patient advocates frequently engage in activities that are prohibited or unauthorized under federal law. These activities have placed their clients in peril and have taken them away from their federally-mandated mission.
This article examines how patient advocates have engaged in federally prohibited lobbying efforts and how they have tried to defeat proposed legislation, some of which would actually benefit their clients. It also explores their shift away from individual representation, which has placed more individuals with mental illness at risk. And it reveals their hostile attitude towards the families of those with mental illness, an attitude that is in direct conflict to the intent and purpose of PAIMI. Finally, it addresses the problems with each of these activities and it offers solutions that Congress can incorporate in the Act when it is revised next year.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: Mental Health Patient AdvocacyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 9, 2010 ; Last revised: February 17, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds