Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1567221
 
 

Footnotes (124)



 


 



The Story of Pickering v. Bd. of Education: Unconstitutional Conditions and Public Employment


Paul M. Secunda


Marquette University - Law School

August 24, 2010

FIRST AMENDMENT LAW STORIES, Richard W. Garnett & Andrew Koppelman eds., 2010
Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 10-35

Abstract:     
The story of Pickering v. Bd. of Education, a foundational case in public employment law, prominently foreshadows more generally the coming prominence of the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions in constitutional law. Under that doctrine, the Supreme Court limits a government actor, like a government employer, from being able to condition governmental benefits, like public employment, on the basis of individuals forfeiting their constitutional rights. It would thus seem to follow that a public employee should not have to sacrifice constitutionally-protected rights in order to enjoy the benefits and privileges of public employment. Yet, today, that is far from the actual case.

So why have First Amendment public employee speech rights, which have traditionally enjoyed protection under the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions, suddenly diminished in recent years? I want to suggest in this contribution to First Amendment Law Stories that a certain jurisprudential school of thought – the “subsidy school” – has significantly undermined the vitality of the unconstitutional conditions doctrine through its largely successful sparring with an alternative school of thought, the “penalty school.” Under the subsidy school of thought, in contexts as different as abortion funding to the provision of tax exemptions, the unconstitutional conditions doctrine has become largely toothless, as government actors can simply compel a given result by saying they are doing nothing but subsidizing (or not subsidizing) a right a citizen or public employee already has under the Constitution.

In order to more concretely illustrate the genesis of the unconstitutional conditions doctrine, and its recent distortions, this Chapter returns to an in-depth exploration of the case that started it all: Pickering v. Bd. of Education. Although the Court decided this case in Marvin Pickering’s favor, the resulting framework has, over the years, been interpreted by the Supreme Court in a manner that significantly limits public employee free speech rights.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Pickering, Pickering v. Bd. of Education, public employee, government employee, free speech, First Amendment, unconstitutional conditions, government speech doctrine

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 11, 2010 ; Last revised: August 29, 2010

Suggested Citation

Secunda, Paul M., The Story of Pickering v. Bd. of Education: Unconstitutional Conditions and Public Employment (August 24, 2010). FIRST AMENDMENT LAW STORIES, Richard W. Garnett & Andrew Koppelman eds., 2010; Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 10-35. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1567221

Contact Information

Paul M. Secunda (Contact Author)
Marquette University - Law School ( email )
Eckstein Hall
P.O. Box 1881
Milwaukee, WI 53201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 824
Downloads: 132
Download Rank: 127,919
Footnotes:  124

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.234 seconds