Caperton’s New Right to Independence in Judges
Gerard J. Clark
Suffolk University Law School
March 10, 2010
Drake Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 661, 2010
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 10-14
In the Caperton case (2009) the USSC applied the Due Process Clause to reverse the refusal of a West Virginia Supreme Court judge to recuse himself is spite of having received $3,000,000 in campaign contributions from a defendant. The judge then cast the deciding vote to reverse a jury award of $50,000,000 in damages for driving the plaintiff out of business. The article reviews the common law origins of conflict of interest law, and summarizes procedural due process. It describes procedures for examining judicial ethics including statutory sanctions, judicial conduct commissions and recusal. It reviews in detail the opinions of the WVSCA and critiques them. It gives an overview of judicial elections as well as the First Amendment principles involved in campaign regulation and financing. It endorses the ABA proposals passed in the August, 2009 in response to the case.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 15, 2010 ; Last revised: August 28, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds