Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1568884
 
 

Citations



 


 



The Distortionary Effect of Evidence on Primary Behavior


Gideon Parchomovsky


University of Pennsylvania Law School; Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law

Alex Stein


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

July 30, 2010

Harvard Law Review, Vol. 124, 2010
U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 10-02
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-11
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 291

Abstract:     
In this essay, we analyze how evidentiary concerns dominate actors’ behavior. Our findings offer an important refinement to the conventional wisdom in law and economics literature, which assumes that legal rules can always be fashioned to achieve socially optimal outcomes. We show that evidentiary motivations will often lead actors to engage in socially suboptimal behavior when doing so is likely to increase their likelihood of prevailing in court. Because adjudicators must base decisions on observable and verifiable information - or, in short, evidence - rational actors will always strive to generate evidence that can later be presented in court and increase their chances of winning the case regardless of the cost they impose on third parties and society at large. Accordingly, doctors and medical institutions will often refer patients to undertake unnecessary and even harmful examinations just to create a record that they went beyond the call of duty in treating them. Owners of land and intellectual property may let harmful activities continue much longer than necessary just to gather stronger evidence concerning the harm they suffer. And even the police will often choose to allow offenders to carry out crimes in order to improve the chance of a conviction. The effect we identify is pervasive. It can be found in virtually all areas of the law.

Furthermore, there is no easy way to eliminate or correct it. It should be noted, however, that the evidentiary phenomenon we discuss also has a positive side effect: it reduces adjudication costs for judges and juries and improves the accuracy of court processes. In some cases, this improvement will exceed the social cost stemming from actors’ suboptimal behavior. In other contexts, however, the social cost will far outweigh the benefit.

Keywords: suboptimal behavior, creation and preservation of evidence, social costs, adjudication costs, law and economics, psychology, proof of facts, damages, preserving proof, incentives of proof, decisionmaking

JEL Classification: D63, K10, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 13, 2010 ; Last revised: December 21, 2010

Suggested Citation

Parchomovsky, Gideon and Stein, Alex, The Distortionary Effect of Evidence on Primary Behavior (July 30, 2010). Harvard Law Review, Vol. 124, 2010; U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 10-02; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-11; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 291. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1568884

Contact Information

Gideon Parchomovsky (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-1603 (Phone)
Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Gan 52900
Israel
972-2-5317078 (Phone)
Alex Stein
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 811

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds