The Paradox of Balancing Significant Interests

Stephen E. Gottlieb

Albany Law School


Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 825, 1994

Addresses the changing constitutional discourse on the Court, argues that the justices have no choice but to balance rights and “interests” regardless of their verbal formulas, and explores the consequences of taking a principled approach to rights and interests.

Keywords: Balancing, Compelling government interests, Constitutional law, Decision theory, Discretion, Fundamental rights, Incrementalism, Intentions, Interpretation, Interpretive consistency, Jurisprudence, Positive rights, Rational choice, State Action, Strict scrutiny, Supreme Court

Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 14, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Gottlieb, Stephen E., The Paradox of Balancing Significant Interests (1994). Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 825, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1569014

Contact Information

Stephen E. Gottlieb (Contact Author)
Albany Law School ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States
518-445-2348 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 271

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.141 seconds