Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism
Alec Stone Sweet
Yale University - Yale Law School and Yale Political Science
Penn State Law
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 47, pp. 68-149, 2008
Over the past fifty years, proportionality balancing – an analytical procedure akin to strict scrutiny in the United States – has become a dominant technique of rights adjudication in the world. From German origins, proportionality analysis spread across Europe, into Commonwealth systems (Canada, New Zealand, South Africa), and Israel; it has also migrated to treaty-based regimes, including the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights, and the World Trade Organization. Part II proposes a theory of why judges are attracted to the procedure, an account that blends strategic and normative elements. Parts III and IV provide a genealogy of proportionality, trace its global diffusion, and evaluate its impact on law and politics in a variety of settings, both national and supranational. In the conclusion, we discuss our major finding, namely, that proportionality constitutes a doctrinal underpinning for the expansion of judicial power globally. Although there is significant variation in how it is used, judges who adopt proportionality position themselves to exercise dominance over policymaking and constitutional development.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 93
Keywords: constitutional law, balancing, rights, comparative law, proportionality, judging, EU, ECHR, WTOAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 16, 2010 ; Last revised: May 31, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.718 seconds