Can Overconfidence and Biased Self-Attribution Explain the Momentum, Reversal and Share Issuance Anomalies? Evidence from Short-Term Institutional Investors
University of Notre Dame
December 1, 2011
AFA 2011 Denver Meetings Paper
This paper presents evidence supporting the theory that market under- and overreactions are based on investor overconfidence and biased self-attribution, two well-documented psychological biases. Our proxy for overconfidence is the duration of the stock in the investor’s portfolio, with overconfidence leading to overly frequent trading. Biased self-attribution is captured by focusing on short-term institutional investors with excellent recent performance. Consistent with the predictions of Daniel, Hirshleifer and Subrahmanyam (1998), the presence of short-term institutional investors can help explain increases in idiosyncratic volatility as well as many of the best-known stock return anomalies. Specifically, momentum returns, subsequent returns reversal, as well as the share issuance anomalies are generally much stronger for stocks held primarily by short-term investors, especially if these investors had superior recent performance. Our results are symmetric on the long and short side of these anomalies, ruling out the alternative hypothesis of superior skills.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 59
Keywords: stock holding duration, return anomalies, institutional investors
JEL Classification: G12, G14working papers series
Date posted: March 17, 2010 ; Last revised: February 23, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.578 seconds