|
||||
|
||||
Performance Measurement as a Political Discipline MechanismAnthony M. BertelliUSC Price School of Public Policy; USC Gould School of Law; University of Birmingham Peter JohnUniversity College London September 9, 2010 USC CLEO Research Paper No. C10-5 USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 10-5 Abstract: Governments at one level increasingly develop measures of the activities of policymakers at another. That policymaking behavior as well as the measures can have electoral consequences. A large literature has developed in public administration and policy that assesses the determinants and validity of performance measures and their influence on the strategic behavior of public organizations. While recognizing the progress made by this line of research, we introduce a theoretical framework that accounts for the political context in which performance measures emerge and are implemented. Specifically, we claim that superordinate governments use these kinds of performance measures as a political discipline mechanism (PDM) to incentivize the behavior of subordinate governments. We present a formal model and derive a set of testable implications of interest to researchers on performance management and bureaucratic politics
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32 Keywords: Performance Measures, Distributive Politics, Bureaucratic Control, Public Administration and Management working papers seriesDate posted: March 25, 2010 ; Last revised: September 13, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds