Acquisitions as Lotteries? The Selection of Target-Firm Risk and its Impact on Merger Outcomes
University of Mannheim - Department of Business Administration and Finance
Oliver G. Spalt
Tilburg University - Department of Finance
January 9, 2015
Critical Finance Review (Forthcoming)
From 1987 to 2008, riskier firms were more likely to be taken over. Yet, on average, the acquirer declined in value by 2.8% when it bought a "risky target" (the third tercile, having an annualized idiosyncratic volatility of 61% or more), but only by 0.6% when it bought a "safe target" (the first tercile, 38% or less). The effect was even stronger for risky targets with positively skewed expected returns. The value difference is robust to controlling for acquirer and target characteristics, and carries over to the joint value change. Riskier target acquisitions also had lower post-acquisition accounting returns. An acquiring-firm CEO fixed effect in the data suggests CEO preferences play a role, which we can trace to several proxies for gambling propensity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 62
Keywords: Behavioral Corporate Finance, Mergers and Acquisitions, Gambling
JEL Classification: G34, G14, G39
Date posted: April 1, 2010 ; Last revised: January 14, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds