Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1572908
 
 

Footnotes (158)



 


 



Regulating Consumer Demand in Insurance Markets


Daniel Schwarcz


University of Minnesota Law School

March 16, 2010

Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 23, 2010
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-24

Abstract:     
In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that Expected Utility Theory (EUT) is a remarkably poor theory of how and why individuals purchase insurance. However, the normative implications of this conclusion have remained largely unexplored. This Article takes up this issue. It argues that many observed deviations from EUT are likely the result of mistakes, in the sense that consumers would act differently than they do if they possessed perfect information and cognitive resources. From this perspective, regulatory interventions designed to improve consumer decision-making about insurance are potentially desirable. At the same time, the Article argues that some deviations from EUT may actually reflect sophisticated consumer behavior. In some cases, seemingly puzzling insurance decisions may help consumers manage emotions such as anxiety, regret, and loss aversion, while in other cases they may represent valuable commitment strategies.

Because consumers’ insurance decisions may reflect sophisticated, rather than mistaken, decision-making, regulatory interventions that limit consumer choice are normatively troubling. Given these conflicting explanations for EUT’s failure as a descriptive theory of consumer demand in insurance markets, the Article explores a spectrum of “Libertarian Paternalistic” regulatory interventions. It argues that regulatory strategies that aim to encourage presumptively welfare-maximizing insurance decisions without restricting individual choice represent a promising and normatively defensible opportunity for improving consumer behavior in insurance markets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Insurance, Demand Anomalies, Libertarian Paternalism, Expected Utility Theory

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 23, 2010 ; Last revised: September 13, 2010

Suggested Citation

Schwarcz, Daniel, Regulating Consumer Demand in Insurance Markets (March 16, 2010). Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 23, 2010; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1572908

Contact Information

Daniel B. Schwarcz (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,191
Downloads: 252
Download Rank: 68,216
Footnotes:  158

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds