|
||||
|
||||
Counterparty Risk Externality: Centralized Versus Over-The-Counter MarketsViral V. AcharyaNew York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); New York University (NYU) - Department of Finance Alberto BisinNew York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics June 2010 Abstract: The opacity of over-the-counter (OTC) markets – in which a large number of financial products including credit derivatives trade – appears to have played a central role in the ongoing financial crisis. We model such OTC markets for risk-sharing in a general equilibrium setup where agents have incentives to default and their financial positions are not mutually observable. We show that in this setting, there is excess "leverage" in that parties in OTC contracts take on short positions that lead to levels of default risk that are higher than Pareto-efficient ones. In particular, OTC markets feature a counterparty risk externality that we show can lead to ex-ante productive inefficiency. This externality is absent when trading is organized via a centralized clearing mechanism that provides transparency of trade positions, or centralized counterparty such as an exchange that observes all trades and sets prices.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48 Keywords: OTC markets, leverage, counterparty risk, externality, transparency, centralized clearing, exchange JEL Classification: G14, G2, G33, D52, D53, D62 working papers seriesDate posted: March 22, 2010 ; Last revised: August 9, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.391 seconds