Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1575843
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (433)



 


 



A Psychology of Intellectual Property


Jeanne C. Fromer


New York University School of Law

September 3, 2010

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 104, p. 1441, 2010
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1575843

Abstract:     
This Article analyzes how the strict standard for protectability in patent law - novelty, nonobviousness, and utility - looks so different from the undemanding standard of originality in copyright law, even though they derive from the same constitutional power, “To promote the Progress of Science and Useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” This Article argues that this difference accords with the psychological literature on creativity, something these laws seek to induce. This literature explores both how scientists and engineers - ultimately protected by patent - and artists - ultimately protected by copyright - go about creating their works and how individuals in the audience for these works value the different components of creativity. This Article suggests that creativity in scientific and engineering inventions is distinguished by an emphasis on problem solving and individuals’ tolerance and willingness to embrace large degrees of newness. By contrast, artistic creativity is characterized by an emphasis on problem finding and individuals’ psychological preference that artistic works be new, but not too new. These differences accord with the dissimilar protectability standards for copyright and patent. These distinctions in protectability standards are also normatively desirable, but only to the extent that the law addresses how to treat protected forms of creativity that do not fit the archetype of creativity for the relevant intellectual-property regime.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: Intellectual Property, Patent, Copyright, Psychology, Creativity, Protectability, Novelty, Nonobviousness, Utility, Originality, Science, Engineering, Invention, Art, Problem Solving, Problem Finding

JEL Classification: O31, O34, K00

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 21, 2010 ; Last revised: March 7, 2011

Suggested Citation

Fromer, Jeanne C., A Psychology of Intellectual Property (September 3, 2010). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 104, p. 1441, 2010; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1575843. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1575843

Contact Information

Jeanne C. Fromer (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,112
Downloads: 657
Download Rank: 20,993
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  433
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.063 seconds