Tactical Dilatory Practice in Litigation: Evidence from EC Merger Proceedings
Peter L. Ormosi
University of East Anglia (UEA) - Centre for Competition Policy; Norwich Business School
August 8, 2011
CCP Working Paper 11-12
This paper looks at the main source of procedural delay in EC merger cases, the suspension of investigations. Although the ECMR refers to the suspension of investigations as an exceptional instrument, it is used in a high proportion of cases. As the ECMR does not set a time limit for suspension, it can lead to significant delay in the assessment of mergers. To understand the causes of delay, this article relies on the fact that the suspension of the investigation is a consequence of merging parties’ failure to provide the necessary information to the Commission. Two main causes of this behaviour are identified. Firstly, merging parties may decide to intentionally withhold information in order to cause the suspension of the investigation, which allows them more time to do whatever is necessary to avoid a lengthy second phase investigation. Secondly, failure to provide the required information to the Commission may be a result of merging parties’ negligence towards the regulatory assessment of their merger. Whereas the first case may be socially beneficial, identifying the second type of behaviour may help in filtering out inefficient mergers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: European Commission, mergers, merger remedies, suspension of investigation, merger delay
JEL Classification: K21, K41
Date posted: March 27, 2010 ; Last revised: August 11, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.501 seconds