Presidential Values in Parliamentary Democracies
Boston College - Law School; Yale University - Law School
March 23, 2010
International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2010
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 194
Constitutional theory has long regarded the separation of powers as unique to presidential systems and incompatible with parliamentary ones. In this Article, I suggest that the core values of the separation of powers are achievable in both presidential and parliamentary systems, contrary to the conventional wisdom which insists that the separation of powers is the exclusive province of presidentialism. This conclusion – that parliamentary and presidential systems are comparably receptive to the practical and philosophical strictures of the separation of powers – unlocks interesting possibilities for rethinking constitutional structure anew.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: Constitutional Theory, Constitutional Design, Separation of Powers, Parliamentarism, Presidentialism, Comparative Constitutional Structure
Date posted: March 26, 2010 ; Last revised: November 3, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.453 seconds