Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1577824
 


 



Is an Exemption from U.S. Groundwater Regulations a Loophole or a Noose?


Brigham Daniels


Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

Erika Weinthal


Duke University - Nicholas School for the Environment

Blake Hudson


LSU Law Center; LSU School of the Coast and Environment

July 1, 2008

Policy Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 205-220, September 2008

Abstract:     
In the United States, the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) regulates most groundwater used for drinking water. The Act covers most urban areas but because it does not cover small water systems, it implicitly exempts nearly half of those living in rural America. In large measure, monitoring required by the SDWA has illustrated the prevalence of naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater in concentrated areas throughout the country. Even though many in Congress seem aware of this threat and have, indeed, supported more stringent arsenic standards, Congress, on the whole, has failed to update the SDWA to cover those water systems left unprotected by the Act. Conventional political science theory suggests that effective congressional oversight depends on Congress creating both active (e.g., hearings and commissioned studies) and passive oversight mechanisms (i.e., citizen suits and opportunities for constituent feedback). In this case, Congress had, in fact, created sufficient tools to detect a serious problem but, having identified it, nevertheless failed to respond. Why? In exploring Congress's inaction, we find something unexpected: the structure of the SDWA has created perverse incentives not only for unregulated water systems but also for regulated systems to push to keep exempted water systems unregulated. The outcome is that those outside of the SDWA’s protections remain outside and continue to drink contaminated water by the glass full. So, while Congress created a loophole, it may have inadvertently tied a noose.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 1

Keywords: Groundwater, Congressional Oversight, Safe Drinking Water Act, Arsenic

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 29, 2010 ; Last revised: April 28, 2010

Suggested Citation

Daniels, Brigham and Weinthal, Erika and Hudson, Blake, Is an Exemption from U.S. Groundwater Regulations a Loophole or a Noose? (July 1, 2008). Policy Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 205-220, September 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1577824

Contact Information

Brigham Daniels
Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )
430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States
Erika Weinthal
Duke University - Nicholas School for the Environment ( email )
Box 90328
Durham, NC 27708-0328
United States
Blake Hudson (Contact Author)
LSU Law Center ( email )
440 Law Center Building
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
United States
LSU School of the Coast and Environment ( email )
Baton Rouge, LA
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 505
Downloads: 156
Download Rank: 110,431

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.453 seconds