Footnotes (417)



Science-Dependent Prosecution and the Problem of Epistemic Contingency: A Study of Shaken Baby Syndrome

Deborah Tuerkheimer

Northwestern University - School of Law

March 27, 2010

Alabama Law Review, Vol. 62, p. 513, 2011

The path of scientific change is unforeseeable and may be marked by abrupt shifts in course. When these shifts occur, our criminal justice system is ill-equipped to respond expeditiously; it thus lags behind scientific frontiers. In an age where science-dependent prosecutions are proliferating, this failure is of particular concern. Because it is fully constructed by and dependent on medical expertise, Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) raises in stark form the problems that arise when science outpaces law — most troublingly, the prospect that we are imprisoning people who have committed no crime. The trajectory of SBS in the criminal courts reveals fundamental limitations of our system’s ability to absorb forensic advances in a manner consistent with the administration of justice. The law may ultimately align itself with the latest scientific thinking, but it is doing so slowly, arbitrarily, and in a wholly unreasoned (and unstudied) fashion. In the interim, we are witnessing patterned injustice.

This Article constructs a conceptual framework that describes and critiques how criminal justice evolves in the wake of scientific change. It thus begins the process of reforming institutions, laws, and practices to better account for the tentative nature of scientific orthodoxy. By priming the system to deal more effectively with epistemic contingency, we affirm our commitment to protecting the innocent.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: Shaken Baby Syndrome, Forensic Science, Expert Testimony

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2010 ; Last revised: May 1, 2011

Suggested Citation

Tuerkheimer, Deborah, Science-Dependent Prosecution and the Problem of Epistemic Contingency: A Study of Shaken Baby Syndrome (March 27, 2010). Alabama Law Review, Vol. 62, p. 513, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1579394

Contact Information

Deborah Tuerkheimer (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,355
Downloads: 605
Download Rank: 28,145
Footnotes:  417
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.391 seconds