Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1580165
 
 

Footnotes (118)



 


 



Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary


Chad M. Oldfather


Marquette University - Law School

June 28, 2010

George Washington Law Review, Vol. 78, p. 846, 2010
Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 10-15

Abstract:     
This essay, which is a review of William Domnarski’s “Federal Judges Revealed” (Oxford University Press, 2008), explores the usefulness of oral history as a vehicle for understanding the judiciary. “Federal Judges Revealed” presents the insights gleaned from a study of over 100 oral histories given by Article III judges, ranging across the span of the judges’ lives. The essay first explores the methodological strengths and weaknesses of oral history as a general matter, and then further develops the analysis through a review of three oral histories given by the late Seventh Circuit Judge Thomas Fairchild. The essay then turns specifically to Domnarski’s book, outlining the ways in which it contributes to our understanding of judges and the judiciary.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: oral history, judges, judiciary

JEL Classification: K19, K4, K41, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 31, 2010 ; Last revised: June 28, 2010

Suggested Citation

Oldfather, Chad M., Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary (June 28, 2010). George Washington Law Review, Vol. 78, p. 846, 2010; Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 10-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1580165

Contact Information

Chad M. Oldfather (Contact Author)
Marquette University - Law School ( email )
Eckstein Hall
P.O. Box 1881
Milwaukee, WI 53201
United States
414.288.8031 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 611
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 173,399
Footnotes:  118

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds