Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary
Chad M. Oldfather
Marquette University - Law School
June 28, 2010
George Washington Law Review, Vol. 78, p. 846, 2010
Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 10-15
This essay, which is a review of William Domnarski’s “Federal Judges Revealed” (Oxford University Press, 2008), explores the usefulness of oral history as a vehicle for understanding the judiciary. “Federal Judges Revealed” presents the insights gleaned from a study of over 100 oral histories given by Article III judges, ranging across the span of the judges’ lives. The essay first explores the methodological strengths and weaknesses of oral history as a general matter, and then further develops the analysis through a review of three oral histories given by the late Seventh Circuit Judge Thomas Fairchild. The essay then turns specifically to Domnarski’s book, outlining the ways in which it contributes to our understanding of judges and the judiciary.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: oral history, judges, judiciary
JEL Classification: K19, K4, K41, K49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 31, 2010 ; Last revised: June 28, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.266 seconds