|
||||
|
||||
Should Congress Pass the Employee Free Choice Act? Some Neighborly AdviceJohn GodardUniversity of Manitoba - Department of Business Administration Joseph B. RoseMcMaster University - DeGroote School of Business Sara SlinnYork University - Osgoode Hall Law School March 29, 2010 Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, Vol. 15, p. 116, 2009 Abstract: American labour law is broken. As many as 60 percent of American workers would like to have a union, yet only 12 percent actually do. This is largely due to systematic employer interference, often in violation of existing laws. The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), currently before Congress, contains provisions to rectify this problem. Canada's experience with similar provisions can be helpful in evaluating the arguments surrounding this act. It suggests that the reforms proposed in EFCA can be expected to safeguard rather than deny employees' free choices. They will not alter the balance of power in collective bargaining, but only help to ensure that workers can exercise their basic right to meaningful representation at work and, potentially, to win gains that could help to reduce inequality and return America to prosperity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5 Keywords: EFCA, Employee Free Choice Act, NLRB, National Labor Relations Board, collective bargaining, Wagner Act, Canada, labor law JEL Classification: K31, K21, N30, J50, J51, J52, J58 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 1, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.407 seconds