Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1580487
 
 

References (50)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Gender and State Supreme Courts: Explaining Male and Female Judges' Concurring and Dissenting Behavior


Tao Dumas


Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

March 2010

Western Political Science Association 2010 Annual Meeting Paper

Abstract:     
In this paper I build on previous research by exploring gender differences in judging on state supreme courts while controlling for ideology and institutional features. This paper provides an important contribution to the study of gender and judging by examining a large number of votes for a relatively large sample of women judges across a number of issue areas in criminal law. Utilizing a multinomial LOGIT model, I find significant differences between men and women's willingness to express disagreement in the form of concurring and dissenting votes. Specifically, I find that female judges evidence a stronger tendency to express disagreement through concurring rather than dissenting votes as compared to their male counterparts. I also find evidence that ideology and institutional design condition the relationship between gender and judicial decision-making.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 29, 2010 ; Last revised: April 2, 2010

Suggested Citation

Dumas, Tao, Gender and State Supreme Courts: Explaining Male and Female Judges' Concurring and Dissenting Behavior (March 2010). Western Political Science Association 2010 Annual Meeting Paper . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1580487

Contact Information

Tao Dumas (Contact Author)
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge ( email )
136 Atkinson
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 630
Downloads: 132
Download Rank: 131,313
References:  50
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.438 seconds