Citations (2)



Rethinking Conscious Design Liability for Prescription Drugs: The Restatement (Third) Standard Versus a Negligence Approach

Richard L. Cupp Jr.

Pepperdine University School of Law


George Washington Law Review, Vol. 63, 1994

The American Law Institute is presently drafting a new approach to prescription product design liability in its proposed Restatement (Third) of Torts. This new approach would reduce confusion surrounding prescription products by almost completely immunizing them from design defect liability. The proposed new Restatement justifies its near-immunity standard by arguing that prescription product designs are unique in their potential for helping some classes of consumers while hurting others, that warnings defect claims provide consumers sufficient protection, and that the Food and Drug Administration approval process lessens the need for design liability.

This Article challenges these arguments and contends that a near-immunity standard provides too much protection for manufacturers and too little protection for consumers. However, this Article agrees that prescription products merit some special protection and rejects applying a strict liability standard to such products. Instead, this Article supports utilizing a middle-ground negligence test for prescription product design liability. Applying a negligence test would offer prescription products designers significant protections not available under a strict liability standard but would not allow the negative consequences of nearly immunizing drug manufacturers from design liability.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: torts, restatement, prescription, medication, medicine, drug, pharmaceutical, liability, design defect, immunity, consumer protection, product liability, negligence

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: April 2, 2010 ; Last revised: October 23, 2013

Suggested Citation

Cupp, Richard L., Rethinking Conscious Design Liability for Prescription Drugs: The Restatement (Third) Standard Versus a Negligence Approach (1994). George Washington Law Review, Vol. 63, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1582558

Contact Information

R.L. Cupp Jr. (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
(310) 506-4658 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 249
Downloads: 37
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.359 seconds