|
||||
|
||||
Behavioral AntitrustAmanda P. ReevesLatham & Watkins LLP Maurice E. StuckeUniversity of Tennessee College of Law March 31, 2010 Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 86, 2010 University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 106 Abstract: Competition policy is entering a new age. Interest in competition laws has increased world-wide, and the United States no longer holds a monopoly on antitrust policy. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the question for competition authorities is whether and to what extent does bounded rationality, self-interest and willpower matter. This article explores how the behavioral economics literature will advance competition policy. With increasing interest in the United States and abroad in the implications of behavioral economics for competition policy, this Article first provides an overview of behavioral economics. It next discusses how the assumption of rational, self-interested profit maximizers became so embedded in competition policy. The Article then discusses to what extent the behavioral economics literature can inform antitrust policies, and provides several recommendations related to the practical application of behavioral economics to competition policy going forward.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 60 Keywords: Antitrust, Behavioral Economics, Competition Policy, Sherman Act, Monopolization, Cartels JEL Classification: K21, L40, L41, L42, L44 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 2, 2010 ; Last revised: June 28, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.421 seconds