Imagining Judges that Apply Law: How They Might Do It
James R. Maxeiner
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Penn State Law Review, Vol. 114, No. 2, 2009
"Judges should apply the law, not make it." That plea appears perennially in American politics. American legal scholars belittle it as a simple-minded demand that is silly and misleading. A glance beyond our shores dispels the notion that the American public is naive to expect judges to apply rather than to make law.
American obsession with judicial lawmaking has its price: indifference to judicial law applying. If truth be told, practically we have no method for judges, as a matter of routine, to apply law to facts. Our failure leads American legal scholars to question whether applying law to facts is a necessary feature of civil procedure at all.
German civil justice does have a method for routinely applying law to facts. It is called, in German, the "Relationstechnik," that is, in English, literally "relationship technique." This article introduces it to American lawyers and judges and shows how it helps make German civil justice effective.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: judges, jurisprudence, civil law, German civil law, German civil justice, judiciary, attorneys, lawyers, relationstechnik, civil procedure,
JEL Classification: K33, K19working papers series
Date posted: April 5, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.562 seconds