Abstract

 


 



Lessons from the Pupil: A Canadian Solution to the American Exclusionary Rule Debate


James Stribopoulos


York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

1999

Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 22, pp. 77-140, 1999

Abstract:     
Modern constitutional documents frequently incorporate specific restraints on police investigatory powers. These provisions typically supplement guarantees aimed at ensuring fair standards in the criminal process, for those detained or charged with a crime. Most of these documents echo themes first articulated in the United States' Bill of Rights and reiterated centuries later in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.These recent global developments are not surprising. The potential for tyranny is constant, even in modern societies. Those drafting contemporary constitutional.documents need only recall the very recent experience in South Africa to be reminded of the dangers that flow from unchecked police powers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 1, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Stribopoulos, James, Lessons from the Pupil: A Canadian Solution to the American Exclusionary Rule Debate (1999). Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 22, pp. 77-140, 1999. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1583006

Contact Information

James Stribopoulos (Contact Author)
York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 200
Downloads: 20

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.468 seconds