Right to Confrontation: Application of Crawford v. Washington to Documents
Byron L. Warnken
University of Baltimore School of Law
January 13, 2010
In 2004, the Supreme Court decided Crawford v. Washington, which “breathed new life” into the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause, precluding testimonial hearsay, except under limited circumstances. In 2009 and 2010, the Supreme Court addressed the Crawford prohibition against testimonial hearsay, in the context of forensic analysis laboratory reports, in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts and Briscoe v. Virginia. This five-page 2010 CLE (continuing legal education) brochure is titled “Right to Confrontation: Application of Crawford v. Washington to Documents.” It examines those two Supreme Court cases, as well as 12 post-Melendez cases from around the country (ten state cases and two federal cases), in the context of (1) CDS analysis, (2) breathalyzer results, (3) medical reports, (4) DNA testing, (5) autopsy reports, (6) business records, and (7) driving records.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: Crawford v. Washington, right to confrontation, criminal law, criminal procedure, Confrontation Clause, constitutional law
JEL Classification: K14, K19, K49working papers series
Date posted: April 4, 2010 ; Last revised: July 13, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.657 seconds