'When the Trouble Started': The Story of Frontiero v. Richardson
University of Pennsylvania Law School
February 4, 2011
WOMEN AND THE LAW STORIES, Elizabeth Schneider and Stephanie M. Wildman, eds., Foundation Press, 2011
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-13
This chapter for Women and the Law Stories (Elizabeth M. Schneider & Stephanie M. Wildman, eds., 2010) tells the story of Frontiero v. Richardson from its origins on an Air Force base in Alabama to its rich and complicated role in American constitutional law and social movement history. The Frontiero litigation provides a lens through which to explore cooperation and conflict among civil rights lawyers; the legal strategy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and other feminist advocates; and internal debates among lower court judges and Supreme Court Justices about the nature of sex discrimination, judicial review, and constitutional change. Frontiero’s legacies are manifold, touching on the development of equal protection standards of review; the allocation of government benefits; military equality; gay rights; reproductive freedom; and the relationship between constitutional amendment advocacy and judicial interpretation.
Keywords: Sex discrimination, equal protection, due process, constitutional law, social movement history, legal history, feminism, civil rights, standards of review, allocation of government benefits, military equality, gay rights, reproductive freedom, relationship between constitutional amendment advocacy aAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 5, 2010 ; Last revised: February 7, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.625 seconds