Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (137)



 


 



The Constitutionality (and Futility) of Colorado's Amazon Law


Edward A. Zelinsky


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


State Tax Notes, 2010
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 294

Abstract:     
Colorado’s law Amazon is constitutional, but will not raise significant revenue for Colorado’s treasury. Most prominently, Colorado’s Amazon law does not reach Amazon or Amazon’s sales to its Colorado customers. Only Congress can effectively address the problem at which the various Amazon laws are aimed by authorizing the states to impose sales and use tax enforcement duties on internet (and mail order) sellers lacking physical presence in the taxing states. In light of the demonstrated ability of “big box” retailers to collect states taxes on their internet sales, Congress should now enact legislation to equalize the sales tax treatment of all online sales.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Colorado, Amazon law, dormant Commerce Clause, nexus, internet sales, sales and use tax, big box retailers, Quill, physical presence, mail order

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 5, 2010 ; Last revised: April 10, 2010

Suggested Citation

Zelinsky, Edward A., The Constitutionality (and Futility) of Colorado's Amazon Law. State Tax Notes, 2010; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 294. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1583520

Contact Information

Edward A. Zelinsky (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0277 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 602
Downloads: 134
Download Rank: 107,868
Footnotes:  137
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.407 seconds