Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (149)



 


 



Legality of Lethality: Paradigm Choice and Targeted Killings in Counterterrorism Operations


Adam Ross Pearlman


affiliation not provided to SSRN

March 23, 2010


Abstract:     
Since 9/11, academics and government officials alike have debated whether counterterrorism efforts fit into the laws of war, or are instead criminal law enforcement endeavors. Each legal paradigm, in addition to the authorities granted to the intelligence community, brings with it specific powers and limitations. This paper briefly surveys the legal authorities and implications for the targeted killings of terror suspects within each paradigm: the law of armed conflict, criminal law, and covert action, and argues for the justification of the practice within each. It is not meant to be an exhaustive analysis, but rather serves to raise the key legal issues involved, and concludes by pointing out the policy aspects that ultimately drive whether and how we continue the practice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Terrorism, Counterterrorism, Targeted Killing, Armed Conflict, War, Intelligence, Covert, Criminal, Law Enforcement, Predator, International, 12333

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 3, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Pearlman, Adam Ross, Legality of Lethality: Paradigm Choice and Targeted Killings in Counterterrorism Operations (March 23, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1583985 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1583985

Contact Information

Adam Ross Pearlman (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,695
Downloads: 387
Download Rank: 35,504
Footnotes:  149

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.625 seconds