Legality of Lethality: Paradigm Choice and Targeted Killings in Counterterrorism Operations
Adam Ross Pearlman
affiliation not provided to SSRN
March 23, 2010
Since 9/11, academics and government officials alike have debated whether counterterrorism efforts fit into the laws of war, or are instead criminal law enforcement endeavors. Each legal paradigm, in addition to the authorities granted to the intelligence community, brings with it specific powers and limitations. This paper briefly surveys the legal authorities and implications for the targeted killings of terror suspects within each paradigm: the law of armed conflict, criminal law, and covert action, and argues for the justification of the practice within each. It is not meant to be an exhaustive analysis, but rather serves to raise the key legal issues involved, and concludes by pointing out the policy aspects that ultimately drive whether and how we continue the practice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: Terrorism, Counterterrorism, Targeted Killing, Armed Conflict, War, Intelligence, Covert, Criminal, Law Enforcement, Predator, International, 12333working papers series
Date posted: April 3, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.625 seconds