Liberty, the 'Law of the Land', and Abortion in North Carolina
Louis D. Bilionis
University of Cincinnati College of Law
April 15, 2010
North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 1839, 1993
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 10-14
Does the North Carolina Constitution safeguard a woman’s right to make “the highly personal choice whether or not to terminate her pregnancy”? There has been no definitive ruling from the state courts, so this interesting question may be admitted as open. However, there are two critical premises of North Carolina constitutional law which any respectable inquiry into the state constitutional status of abortion rights in North Carolina must accept as given:
First, North Carolina has traditionally understood the “liberty” secured by the North Carolina Declaration of Rights to be broad. One objection commonly raised against the constitutionalization of abortion rights is that such action requires an impermissible extratextual excursion on the part of the courts, but it is difficult to see any merit in it under the North Carolina Constitution. Second, North Carolina has long understood infringements of such liberty to be subject to judicial review, akin to the heightened judicial scrutiny of official action associated with substantive due process jurisprudence under the federal Due Process Clause. Properly understood, these two principles point in favor of a broadly protective right of choice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: abortion rights, liberty interest, North Carolina Constitution
JEL Classification: K40, K49
Date posted: April 23, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds