Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1584871
 
 

Footnotes (322)



 


 



Vigilante Justice: Prosecutor Misconduct in Capital Cases


Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier


CUNY School of Law

Stephen R. Greenwald


Fordham University School of Law

Harold Reynolds


Private Practice

Jonathan Sussman


New York County Defender Services

April 5, 2010

Wayne Law Review, Vol. 55, pp. 1327-1385, 2009

Abstract:     
This Article examines categories of prosecutor misconduct that may occur in capital cases, and it discusses suggestions to help prevent and remedy such misconduct. The prosecutor’s role is especially important in death penalty cases because the prosecutor is a determining force in the decision of whether a defendant will live or die. Thus, even though prosecutor misconduct is an important concern for all types of cases, it has a special impact in capital cases.

Instances of prosecutor misconduct may occur prior to trial during discovery, during jury selection, and during trial and post-trial. In Part One of the Article, we discuss situations where prosecutors withhold exculpatory evidence from defendants in capital cases. In Part Two, we discuss the problem where prosecutors improperly use pretrial publicity to achieve convictions and death sentences in capital cases. Misconduct may occur during jury selection, and in Part Three, we examine situations where some prosecutors have improperly used peremptory challenges to exclude prospective jurors based upon race. Under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), this type of prosecutor misconduct may rise to constitutional significance. Next, in Part Four, we consider the trial itself and discuss situations where prosecutors improperly used false evidence or statements in capital cases.

In Part Five, we consider methods for addressing misconduct in capital cases. The Article considers three different categories of ways to deter instances of prosecutor misconduct in capital cases: (1) institutional and systemic methods of preventing prosecutor misconduct; (2) punishment of individual prosecutors responsible for egregious misconduct; and (3) remedies for defendants who are victims of misconduct. After giving an overview of various suggestions, the Article concludes with five specific proposals that should be the first steps toward deterring and remedying prosecutor misconduct in capital cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: capital punishment, death penalty, prosecutor misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, prosecutor, ethics, Brady v. Maryland, Batson, criminal law, professional conduct, professional misconduct

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K14, K40, K41, K42

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 5, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Kirchmeier, Jeffrey L. and Greenwald, Stephen R. and Reynolds, Harold and Sussman, Jonathan, Vigilante Justice: Prosecutor Misconduct in Capital Cases (April 5, 2010). Wayne Law Review, Vol. 55, pp. 1327-1385, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1584871

Contact Information

Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier (Contact Author)
CUNY School of Law ( email )
2 Court Square
Long Island City, NY 11101
United States
Stephen R. Greenwald
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Harold Reynolds
Private Practice ( email )
United States
Jonathan Sussman
New York County Defender Services ( email )
225 Broadway
New York, NY 10007-3778
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,164
Downloads: 411
Download Rank: 40,271
Footnotes:  322

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds