Benchmarks as Limits to Arbitrage: Understanding the Low Volatility Anomaly
Malcolm P. Baker
Harvard Business School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Acadian Asset Management Inc., USA
NYU Stern School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
NYU Working Paper No. 2451/29593
Over the past 41 years, high volatility and high beta stocks have substantially underperformed low volatility and low beta stocks in U.S. markets. We propose an explanation that combines the average investor's preference for risk and the typical institutional investor’s mandate to maximize the ratio of excess returns and tracking error relative to a fixed benchmark (the information ratio) without resorting to leverage. Models of delegated asset management show that such mandates discourage arbitrage activity in both high alpha, low beta stocks and low alpha, high beta stocks. This explanation is consistent with several aspects of the low volatility anomaly including why it has strengthened in recent years even as institutional investors have become more dominant.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Date posted: April 6, 2010 ; Last revised: September 10, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.953 seconds