Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1585276
 


 



The Discordance of New York Central Jazz


John Hasnas


Georgetown University - Robert Emmett McDonough School of Business; Georgetown University Law Center

April 6, 2010

Regulation, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 46-53, Spring 2010

Abstract:     
This article argues that, beginning with the 1909 Supreme Court decision in New York Central & Hudson River R.R. v. United States, federal courts have abandoned important principles that were intended to preserve civil liberties. By creating respondeat superior criminal liability, New York Central and subsequent decisions authorized a form of vicarious collective punishment that is inconsistent with these liberal principles. This change shifted the balance of power between prosecution and defense in a way that has had a pernicious effect on the methods employed by federal law enforcement agencies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 6, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Hasnas, John, The Discordance of New York Central Jazz (April 6, 2010). Regulation, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 46-53, Spring 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1585276

Contact Information

John Hasnas (Contact Author)
Georgetown University - Robert Emmett McDonough School of Business ( email )
3700 O Street, NW
Washington, DC 20057
United States
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 426
Downloads: 11

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.218 seconds