Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1586053
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (394)



 


 



Whose Claim Is This Anyway? Third Party Litigation Funding


Maya Steinitz


University of Iowa - College of Law

August 2, 2010

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 4, 2011
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-31

Abstract:     
Third party litigation funding, or litigation finance, is a new industry composed of institutional investors who invest in litigation by providing finance in return for an ownership stake in a legal claim and a contingency in the recovery. Its emergence has been recognized as one of the most significant developments in civil litigation today. It will transform access to justice, and affect numerous areas of the law including corporate law, torts, intellectual property, environmental law, employment law and international law. Hailing from the U.K. and Australia, the practice is de facto prohibited in the U.S., largely through ethical rules disallowing champerty and fee-sharing among lawyers and non-lawyers. But market forces, including pressure exerted on U.S. law firms by overseas competitors with access to funding, are propelling the penetration of the industry into the U.S.

The article addresses litigation finance by institutional investors in the U.S. It describes the empirical reality of the industry; addresses the emergence of a secondary market in legal claims and the prospect of securitization of legal claims; discusses third party funding of international arbitration and; applies a bargaining analysis to understanding the systemic effects of the practice. Specifically, the article asks what happens when, through litigation funding, litigation ceases to be expensive and uncertain and when parties “bargain in the shadow of financing.” Using bargaining theory the article offers a three-step argument for a move away from a prohibition of litigation funding towards nuanced regulation of the industry. First, it argues that the desirability of litigation funding cannot be assessed if viewed monolithically. Therefore, a taxonomy of funded litigations is offered. Second, applying a bargaining analysis to each type of funded litigation, the article argues that the practice could radically alter the social function of courts by systemically equalizing the ability of society’s “have-nots” to use the courts to affect rule change via litigation. This is in contrast to the court system serving (unwittingly, perhaps) as the guardian of the status quo in favor of society’s “haves.” Third, the bargaining analysis reveals the agency problems that may arise due to the development of secondary markets in legal claims as well as other features of litigation finance and which should be addressed through regulation. The article concludes with a five-pronged framework for the suggested regulatory regime that regulators, legislators and the Bench can devise and contract design features parties seeking litigation funding and their lawyers can employ.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 72

Keywords: litigation funding, litigation finance, civil litigation, international arbitration, access to justice, bargaining theory, third party funding

JEL Classification: K2, K19, K29, K33, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 7, 2010 ; Last revised: August 10, 2011

Suggested Citation

Steinitz, Maya, Whose Claim Is This Anyway? Third Party Litigation Funding (August 2, 2010). Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 4, 2011; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-31. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1586053

Contact Information

Maya Steinitz (Contact Author)
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,221
Downloads: 1,284
Download Rank: 7,786
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  394

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.390 seconds