Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1586113
 
 

Footnotes (358)



 


 



Deepening the Discourse Using the Legal Mind's Eye: Lessons from Neuroscience and Educational Psychology that Optimize Law School Learning


Hillary Burgess


Charlotte School of Law

March 24, 2010

Quinnipiac Law Review, 2010

Abstract:     
While critical thinking is one of the most crucial skills in law school, the foundational principles of many core law school courses are also critical to passing the bar and, more importantly, the competent practice of law. However, law students tend to forget significant amount of the doctrine and policy before they graduate.

This article argues that law professors could 1. cover more doctrine and critical thinking skills 2. at more sophisticated levels 3. while knowing that their students will retain much of their lessons throughout their career if they taught using multimodal strategies because students learn higher order thinking skills better with multimodal learning. These ideas can be applied to both students who excel in law school to further challenge them and to access students who need a bit more guidance to demonstrate their full legal potential.

In providing this thesis, this article also argues that the traditional legal classroom typically teaches the lowest four levels of learning and tests the highest four levels of learning.

This article serves three purposes. First, it provides professors with a review of the theoretical and scientific literature on learning theory as it applies to law school. Second, this article provides professors with information about teaching methods that allow students to learn more optimally and retain their learning during their lifetime careers in law. Third, this article provides concrete guidelines for law faculty interested in incorporating visual multimodal strategies effectively in their teaching. The article also provides many concrete examples of specific teaching techniques that professors could adopt in their own class immediately.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Keywords: neuroscience, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, educational psychology, psychology, educational theory, education, legal education, brain, working memory, long term memory, visual, verbal, picture superiority effect, pictorial superiority effect, images, diagrams, flowcharts, flow charts, graph

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 7, 2010 ; Last revised: December 14, 2012

Suggested Citation

Burgess, Hillary, Deepening the Discourse Using the Legal Mind's Eye: Lessons from Neuroscience and Educational Psychology that Optimize Law School Learning (March 24, 2010). Quinnipiac Law Review, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1586113

Contact Information

Hillary Burgess (Contact Author)
Charlotte School of Law ( email )
201 South College Street
Suite 400
Charlotte, NC 28244
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,006
Downloads: 436
Download Rank: 37,370
Footnotes:  358
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds