Knowledge Transfer Between and Within Alliance Partners: Private versus Collective Benefits of Social Capital
The George Washington University - School of Business
University of St. Gallen
Franz W. Kellermanns
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Journal of Business Research, 60(7): 698–710
This article examines the process through which multilevel network structures translate into knowledge acquisition from alliance partners. The degree of knowledge transfer a multidivisional company achieves from its network of alliance partners is determined not only by the organization's external network structure, but also by the structure of relationships among its business units. By distinguishing two perspectives on the distribution of social capital's benefits – private versus collective – this article's approach reconciles the competing views on what types of network structures create social capital, that is, the brokerage and closure views of the social network literature. Private benefits of brokerage and centrality are more beneficial in interfirm networks, whereas collective benefits provided by network closure and low levels of centralization are more beneficial in intrafirm networks.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: Inter- and intrafirm networks, knowledge transfer, social capital, strategic alliances
Date posted: April 10, 2010 ; Last revised: October 19, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.484 seconds