Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1588984
 
 

Footnotes (25)



 


 



The Consequence of Human Differences


Joseph Vining


University of Michigan Law School

April 13, 2010

Journal of Law, Philosophy and Culture, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 21-42, 2010
U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 194

Abstract:     
This essay explores the ways in which the recognition of individual and person in the legal form of thought distinguishes it from forms of thought in evolutionary biology and mathematics that are put forward as means to a complete picture of the world. The essay observes that the legal form of thought is in fact deeply involved in our modern understanding of Nature itself.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Individual, Person, Legal Form of Thought, Law and Evolution, Law and Science, Law and Mathematics, Law and Religion, Humanity, Sentience, Animal Law, Human Experimentation, Animal Experimentation, Torture, Totalitarianism, Realism, Constructivism, Natural Selection, Methodological Naturalism, Metap

JEL Classification: K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 15, 2010 ; Last revised: June 6, 2012

Suggested Citation

Vining, Joseph, The Consequence of Human Differences (April 13, 2010). Journal of Law, Philosophy and Culture, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 21-42, 2010; U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 194. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1588984

Contact Information

Joseph Vining (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 503
Downloads: 83
Download Rank: 175,737
Footnotes:  25

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds