Footnotes (308)



The Unsettling ‘Well-Settled’ Law of Freedom of Association

John D. Inazu

Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

November 20, 2010

Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 149-207, November 2010

This article argues that the Supreme Court’s categories of expressive and intimate association first announced in its 1984 decision, Roberts v. United States Jaycees, are neither well-settled nor defensible. These indefensible categories matter deeply to groups that have sought to maintain an unpopular composition and message in the face of antidiscrimination laws. These groups have been denied associational protections. They have been forced to change their composition - and therefore their message. They no longer exist in the form they once held and desired to maintain.

The Roberts categories of intimate and expressive association are at least partly to blame. They set in place a framework in which courts sidestep the hard work of weighing the constitutional values that shape the laws that bind us. This article exposes the problems inherent in these categories and calls for a meaningful constitutional inquiry into laws impinging upon group autonomy. It suggests that the Court eliminate the Roberts categories and turn instead to the right of assembly. Our right to assemble - to form relationships, to gather, to exist as groups of our choosing - is fundamental to liberty and diversity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: right of association, right of assembly, First Amendment, intimate association, expressive association, Roberts v. Jaycees, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 13, 2010 ; Last revised: November 24, 2010

Suggested Citation

Inazu, John D., The Unsettling ‘Well-Settled’ Law of Freedom of Association (November 20, 2010). Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 149-207, November 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589045

Contact Information

John D. Inazu (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,505
Downloads: 280
Download Rank: 80,546
Footnotes:  308

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds