Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589050
 
 

Footnotes (131)



 


 



'Struck' by Stereotype: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Pregnancy Discrimination as Sex Discrimination


Neil Siegel


Duke University - School of Law

Reva Siegel


Yale University - Law School

January 15, 2010

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2010

Abstract:     
This is an attempt at recovery. This Essay hopes to call attention to then-Professor Ruth Bader Ginsburg's merits brief in Struck v. Secretary of Defense. The brief has been under appreciated in part because the Supreme Court declined to decide the case. But anyone seeking to understand the origins and nature of Justice Ginsburg's views on sex discrimination would be well advised to read this brief. So would anyone interested in reimagining the bounds of constitutional possibility in the realm of gender equality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: sex discrimination, Justice Ginsburg

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 17, 2010 ; Last revised: June 22, 2010

Suggested Citation

Siegel, Neil and Siegel, Reva, 'Struck' by Stereotype: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Pregnancy Discrimination as Sex Discrimination (January 15, 2010). Duke Law Journal, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589050

Contact Information

Neil Siegel (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Reva B. Siegel
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-6791 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 686
Downloads: 139
Download Rank: 126,939
Footnotes:  131

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.218 seconds