Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589428
 
 

Footnotes (396)



 


 



Impeachment as Judicial Selection?


Tuan Samahon


Villanova University - School of Law

August 14, 2009

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 18, pp. 595-656, 2010
Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 20-16

Abstract:     
Ideological judicial selection encompasses more than the affirmative nominating, confirming, and appointing of judges who pre-commit to particular legal interpretations and constructions of constitutional text. It may also include deselection by way of impeachment and removal (or at least its threat) of judges subscribing to interpretations and constructions of the Constitution that one disapproves. This negative tactic may be particularly effective when deployed against judges on closely divided collegial courts, such as the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. courts of appeals, where personnel determine voting majorities and, in turn, majorities determine case outcomes. The Pickering-Chase, Fortas-Douglas, and Christian Coalition impeachments and threats of impeachment illustrate that the use or threat of this tactic is more common than might be supposed. Indeed, recent calls for the removal of Circuit Judge Jay Bybee demonstrate the continuing allure of impeachment as judicial selection.

This Article examines the phenomenon of impeachment as judicial selection through Professors Tushnet’s and Balkin’s framework of “constitutional hardball.” In the case of impeachment as judicial selection, Congress plays constitutional hardball by claiming that it is an appropriate tool for political control and a fraternal twin to the modern appointments process. This Article details prior episodes of impeachment as judicial selection. It explains why the idea of impeachment as an ex post selection tool proves so tempting. It then considers those legal arguments that justify and contest the claims of this variety of constitutional hardball. Further, the Article makes the case that, contrary to conventional wisdom, constitutional and political developments make impeachment a closer alternative to transformative, affirmative selection than in the past. This relative feasibility heightens the fool’s gold allure of impeachment as judicial selection. Actually impeaching for judicial selection, however, would yield results that many would consider as untoward and unacceptably intruding on judicial independence and the rule of law. This Article briefly considers those significant costs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: impeachment, separation of powers, removal, appointment, judicial selection

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 15, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Samahon, Tuan, Impeachment as Judicial Selection? (August 14, 2009). William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 18, pp. 595-656, 2010; Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 20-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589428

Contact Information

Tuan Samahon (Contact Author)
Villanova University - School of Law ( email )
299 N. Spring Mill Road
Villanova, PA 19085
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 330
Downloads: 32
Footnotes:  396

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds