|
||||
|
||||
Strong Steam, Weak Patents, or, the Myth of Watt’s Innovation-Blocking Monopoly, ExplodedGeorge SelginUniversity of Georgia John L. TurnerUniversity of Georgia - C. Herman and Mary Virginia Terry College of Business - Department of Economics April 14, 2010 Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 54, November 2011 Abstract: James Watt’s 1769 patent is widely supposed to have stood in the way of the development of high-pressure steam technology until it finally expired in 1800. We dispute this popular claim. We show that, although it is true that high-pressure steam technology developed only after the expiration of Watt’s patent, the delay was due to factors other than that patent itself, including the widely-held opinion that high-pressure engines were excessively risky. Indeed, Watt’s monopoly rights may actually have hastened the development of the high-pressure steam engine, by inspiring Richard Trevithick to revive a supposedly obsolete technology so as to invent around them.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34 Keywords: Steam engines, James Watt, intellectul monopoly, patents JEL Classification: O31, K11, L43 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 14, 2010 ; Last revised: April 8, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds