The Two-Parameter Long-Horizon Value-at-Risk
Bar Ilan University
Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Jerusalem School of Business Administration
April 1, 2010
Frontiers in Finance and Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-20, 2010
Value-at-Risk (VaR) has become a standard measure for risk management and regulation. In the case of a two-parameter distribution, a common method among practitioners is first to calculate the daily VaR and then to apply it to a longer investment horizon by using the Square Root Rule (SRR). We show that the SRR is theoretically incorrect and propose a correct measure. The error from employing the SRR is positive for short horizons, inducing an overestimation of the true VaR, and negative for longer horizons, inducing underestimation of the true VaR. This error is relatively small for conservative portfolios and for short horizons. However, for risky portfolios and for long horizons – where accurate VaR is most important – the underestimation error is both substantial and systematic.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: Risk Analysis, Risk Management, Value-at-Risk, Basel Regulations, Square Root Rule
JEL Classification: C10, C13, C46Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 16, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds