Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593184
 
 

Footnotes (323)



 


 



Antitrust Censorship of Economic Protest


Hillary Greene


University of Connecticut School of Law

March 1, 2010

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 59, No. 6, 2010

Abstract:     
Antitrust law accepts the competitive marketplace, its operation, and its outcomes as an ideal. Society itself need not and does not. Although antitrust is not in the business of evaluating, for example, the “fairness” of prices, society can, and frequently does, properly concern itself with these issues. When dissatisfaction results, it may manifest itself in an expressive boycott: a form of social campaign wherein purchasers express their dissatisfaction by collectively refusing to buy. Antitrust should neither participate in nor censor such normative discourse. In this Article, I explain how antitrust law impedes this speech, argue why it should not, and provide a framework that accommodates both First Amendment and antitrust values.

The expressive boycotts this Article addresses are characterized by speech that is political yet also economically self-interested. The boycotts discussed involve scientists protesting research tool purveyors, doctors protesting pharmaceutical companies, and academics and librarians protesting for-profit publishers. The legal regimes that govern such undertakings, First Amendment and antitrust law, have proven inept in addressing this phenomenon, which lies at their intersection. I attribute their shortcomings to a combination of the First Amendment’s excessive reliance upon categorization and antitrust’s unduly narrow reliance on economic efficiency. I then craft a recommendation for handling these expressive boycotts that will help ensure that speech about the market can be as free as the market itself.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: antitrust, intellectual property, first amendment, free market


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 21, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Greene, Hillary, Antitrust Censorship of Economic Protest (March 1, 2010). Duke Law Journal, Vol. 59, No. 6, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593184

Contact Information

Hillary Greene (Contact Author)
University of Connecticut School of Law ( email )
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States
339-203-0931 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,609
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 136,556
Footnotes:  323
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Viability of Antitrust Price Squeeze Claims
By Herbert Hovenkamp and Erik Hovenkamp

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds